GEMMA DEVELOPER AGENTSAVED EVIDENCE
← Dataset Exploration
ARCHIVED TRAINING / fox-it/dissect.cstruct

fox-it__dissect.cstruct-66

This is a preserved training example. Membership in the current training wave has not been verified.
fox-it/dissect.cstruct · Task 69 of 169

Problem statement

Keyword conflicting with Python
When the parsed structure contains keywords of Python (e.g., `in`), the compiler complains.

```bash
  File "<some-path>/python3.10/site-packages/dissect/cstruct/compiler.py", line 86, in compile
    code_object = compile(
  File "<compiled in>", line 2
    class in(Structure):
          ^^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
```

A temporary solution I took is to replace all `in` to `_in` then back, which seems a bit ad-hoc.
I wonder if it's possible to fix this in the `cstruct` level?

## Hints:
codecov[bot]: ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
> Comparison is base [(`ffbf4f8`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/commit/ffbf4f83169d5c6db2448d42c0e2fa5cec5c874a?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) 89.00% compared to head [(`d1b024f`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) 89.03%.
> Report is 1 commits behind head on main.


<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>


```diff
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #66      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.00%   89.03%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1855     1860       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         1651     1656       +5     
  Misses        204      204              
```

| [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) | `89.03% <100.00%> (+0.02%)` | :arrow_up: |

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.


</details>

[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it).   
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it).

Training membership

opd_e4b_pure_v7 opd_e4b_pure_v7b

Task issues extracted from preserved verified_rft_messages training examples. This is not a verified current RL wave manifest.

Task and snapshot provenance

Snapshot captured 2026-11-12T17:06:59.476467+00:00 · Autoresearch-Arena/gemma-4-developer-agent

{
  "datasets": [
    "opd_e4b_pure_v7",
    "opd_e4b_pure_v7b"
  ],
  "examples": 9,
  "instance_id": "fox-it__dissect.cstruct-66",
  "problem_statement": "Keyword conflicting with Python\nWhen the parsed structure contains keywords of Python (e.g., `in`), the compiler complains.\r\n\r\n```bash\r\n  File \"<some-path>/python3.10/site-packages/dissect/cstruct/compiler.py\", line 86, in compile\r\n    code_object = compile(\r\n  File \"<compiled in>\", line 2\r\n    class in(Structure):\r\n          ^^\r\nSyntaxError: invalid syntax\r\n```\r\n\r\nA temporary solution I took is to replace all `in` to `_in` then back, which seems a bit ad-hoc.\r\nI wonder if it's possible to fix this in the `cstruct` level?\n\n## Hints:\ncodecov[bot]: ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) Report\nAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:\n> Comparison is base [(`ffbf4f8`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/commit/ffbf4f83169d5c6db2448d42c0e2fa5cec5c874a?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) 89.00% compared to head [(`d1b024f`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) 89.03%.\n> Report is 1 commits behind head on main.\n\n\n<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>\n\n\n```diff\n@@            Coverage Diff             @@\n##             main      #66      +/-   ##\n==========================================\n+ Coverage   89.00%   89.03%   +0.02%     \n==========================================\n  Files          20       20              \n  Lines        1855     1860       +5     \n==========================================\n+ Hits         1651     1656       +5     \n  Misses        204      204              \n```\n\n| [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) | Coverage Δ | |\n|---|---|---|\n| [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) | `89.03% <100.00%> (+0.02%)` | :arrow_up: |\n\nFlags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.\n\n\n</details>\n\n[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/dissect.cstruct/pull/66?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it).   \n:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it).",
  "repo": "fox-it/dissect.cstruct",
  "source": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v7/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
  "source_sha256": "e37f7bd675322f3f81500b73559d60d5f602ca0537bf19f5cb06332c728c7b72"
}
{
  "captured_at": "2026-11-12T17:06:59.476467+00:00",
  "membership": "archived training",
  "membership_evidence": "Task issues extracted from preserved verified_rft_messages training examples. This is not a verified current RL wave manifest.",
  "name": "Preserved post-training task archive",
  "source": "Autoresearch-Arena/gemma-4-developer-agent",
  "source_revision": "016496de222aaafca0d4ee4c18efc63ba616f76e",
  "sources": [
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_cispo_v5/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "a43610ad0dfb6ace95375cfae09000f41afc0338cc925af870a4ade7a9b20c4c"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_hybrid_v3/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "bd326303eb127e8e5e08f03daf97bb88d79d19709d59f3f93f348bc56686a8df"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_onpolicy_v3/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "960c680e797e823a0d3a22f4b1d5ef60a72971373d703b877340b0c9126aaf68"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v6a/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "f045b7ca5b3883a1e2eaee81e1c02a4a1b53dd7b7b36e98bacb2ba5823a15148"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v6b/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "0f62460a9706eea5e1605255896f191ab00cb5706c5f1f2e1c293e9a718218dc"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v7/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "e37f7bd675322f3f81500b73559d60d5f602ca0537bf19f5cb06332c728c7b72"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v7b/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "b864bdc8695183433eef6e31cb8d33fad44ba3aded2170c1ade4ad5b2944ce23"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_self_audit_v4/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "0026023745afb8f3dc1c176dc7f7171157b4ad5a66656b524af218e8e19ceee6"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/rft_e4b_aligned_v2/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "92a4515fee9d152b0d4c510ee3ce4caaaffe2003ba7584469f8027f174aab18c"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/rft_v1/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "a42453ccd7ac7680b0a03865e8e7080bc8bf74c8d9d193b440c441ed46f8512b"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/rft_v2/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "18f4b3bd7e651f83c6acab479c9475e3fa50dc652a384f309e97146983ac85ba"
    }
  ]
}