GEMMA DEVELOPER AGENTSAVED EVIDENCE
← Dataset Exploration
ARCHIVED TRAINING / reanahub/reana-client

reanahub__reana-client-701

This is a preserved training example. Membership in the current training wave has not been verified.
reanahub/reana-client · Task 136 of 169

Problem statement

cli: duration of stopped workflows is not displayed correctly
Similarly to what was happening in reanahub/reana-ui#386, when running `reana-client status --include-duration` for a stopped workflow, the displayed duration is not the time between the moment in which the run was started and the moment in which the run was stopped, but the total time passed from the beginning of the run until the current moment.

```console
❯ reana-client status -w recast --include-duration --json | jq '.[0].status'
"stopped"
❯ reana-client status -w recast --include-duration --json | jq '.[0].duration'
2598
# After a few seconds...
❯ reana-client status -w recast --include-duration --json | jq '.[0].duration'
2604
```

This is very likely because in [`reana_client.utils.get_workflow_duration`](https://github.com/reanahub/reana-client/blob/5b278f131b59d3ecfd3c7f129040a126cd01b60a/reana_client/utils.py#L134) we only look at `run_finished_at`, but not at `run_stopped_at`.


## Hints:
codecov[bot]: ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
> Comparison is base [(`fa5b7c7`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/commit/fa5b7c76eb25bfb1591e6fae4a142d975e14b937?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) 58.57% compared to head [(`d3925f2`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) 58.62%.

<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>


[![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=b85cSEiOhs&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub)

```diff
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #701      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.57%   58.62%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        2390     2393       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1400     1403       +3     
  Misses        990      990              
```


| [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| [reana\_client/api/client.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub#diff-cmVhbmFfY2xpZW50L2FwaS9jbGllbnQucHk=) | `45.54% <100.00%> (ø)` | |
| [reana\_client/utils.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub#diff-cmVhbmFfY2xpZW50L3V0aWxzLnB5) | `76.47% <100.00%> (+0.60%)` | :arrow_up: |
| [reana\_client/validation/environments.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub#diff-cmVhbmFfY2xpZW50L3ZhbGlkYXRpb24vZW52aXJvbm1lbnRzLnB5) | `32.50% <ø> (ø)` | |

</details>
giuseppe-steduto: Note for the reviewer: I chose `status` as the scope of the commit because I think that the commands affected by the PR are a nice user-facing scope for changes to the client. For example, this PR fixes `status`, `list`, and in general the commands that use the `--include-duration` flag, I chose `status` as it is the one most evidently impacted. WDYT?
mdonadoni: Regarding the scope, I think `fix(status)` can be a good choice. WDYT @tiborsimko ?

Training membership

opd_e4b_pure_v6b opd_e4b_pure_v7 opd_e4b_pure_v7b

Task issues extracted from preserved verified_rft_messages training examples. This is not a verified current RL wave manifest.

Task and snapshot provenance

Snapshot captured 2026-11-12T17:06:59.476467+00:00 · Autoresearch-Arena/gemma-4-developer-agent

{
  "datasets": [
    "opd_e4b_pure_v6b",
    "opd_e4b_pure_v7",
    "opd_e4b_pure_v7b"
  ],
  "examples": 10,
  "instance_id": "reanahub__reana-client-701",
  "problem_statement": "cli: duration of stopped workflows is not displayed correctly\nSimilarly to what was happening in reanahub/reana-ui#386, when running `reana-client status --include-duration` for a stopped workflow, the displayed duration is not the time between the moment in which the run was started and the moment in which the run was stopped, but the total time passed from the beginning of the run until the current moment.\r\n\r\n```console\r\n❯ reana-client status -w recast --include-duration --json | jq '.[0].status'\r\n\"stopped\"\r\n❯ reana-client status -w recast --include-duration --json | jq '.[0].duration'\r\n2598\r\n# After a few seconds...\r\n❯ reana-client status -w recast --include-duration --json | jq '.[0].duration'\r\n2604\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis is very likely because in [`reana_client.utils.get_workflow_duration`](https://github.com/reanahub/reana-client/blob/5b278f131b59d3ecfd3c7f129040a126cd01b60a/reana_client/utils.py#L134) we only look at `run_finished_at`, but not at `run_stopped_at`.\r\n\n\n## Hints:\ncodecov[bot]: ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) Report\nAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:\n> Comparison is base [(`fa5b7c7`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/commit/fa5b7c76eb25bfb1591e6fae4a142d975e14b937?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) 58.57% compared to head [(`d3925f2`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) 58.62%.\n\n<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>\n\n\n[![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=b85cSEiOhs&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub)\n\n```diff\n@@            Coverage Diff             @@\n##           master     #701      +/-   ##\n==========================================\n+ Coverage   58.57%   58.62%   +0.05%     \n==========================================\n  Files          24       24              \n  Lines        2390     2393       +3     \n==========================================\n+ Hits         1400     1403       +3     \n  Misses        990      990              \n```\n\n\n| [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub) | Coverage Δ | |\n|---|---|---|\n| [reana\\_client/api/client.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub#diff-cmVhbmFfY2xpZW50L2FwaS9jbGllbnQucHk=) | `45.54% <100.00%> (ø)` | |\n| [reana\\_client/utils.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub#diff-cmVhbmFfY2xpZW50L3V0aWxzLnB5) | `76.47% <100.00%> (+0.60%)` | :arrow_up: |\n| [reana\\_client/validation/environments.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/reanahub/reana-client/pull/701?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=reanahub#diff-cmVhbmFfY2xpZW50L3ZhbGlkYXRpb24vZW52aXJvbm1lbnRzLnB5) | `32.50% <ø> (ø)` | |\n\n</details>\ngiuseppe-steduto: Note for the reviewer: I chose `status` as the scope of the commit because I think that the commands affected by the PR are a nice user-facing scope for changes to the client. For example, this PR fixes `status`, `list`, and in general the commands that use the `--include-duration` flag, I chose `status` as it is the one most evidently impacted. WDYT?\nmdonadoni: Regarding the scope, I think `fix(status)` can be a good choice. WDYT @tiborsimko ?",
  "repo": "reanahub/reana-client",
  "source": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v6b/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
  "source_sha256": "0f62460a9706eea5e1605255896f191ab00cb5706c5f1f2e1c293e9a718218dc"
}
{
  "captured_at": "2026-11-12T17:06:59.476467+00:00",
  "membership": "archived training",
  "membership_evidence": "Task issues extracted from preserved verified_rft_messages training examples. This is not a verified current RL wave manifest.",
  "name": "Preserved post-training task archive",
  "source": "Autoresearch-Arena/gemma-4-developer-agent",
  "source_revision": "016496de222aaafca0d4ee4c18efc63ba616f76e",
  "sources": [
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_cispo_v5/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "a43610ad0dfb6ace95375cfae09000f41afc0338cc925af870a4ade7a9b20c4c"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_hybrid_v3/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "bd326303eb127e8e5e08f03daf97bb88d79d19709d59f3f93f348bc56686a8df"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_onpolicy_v3/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "960c680e797e823a0d3a22f4b1d5ef60a72971373d703b877340b0c9126aaf68"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v6a/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "f045b7ca5b3883a1e2eaee81e1c02a4a1b53dd7b7b36e98bacb2ba5823a15148"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v6b/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "0f62460a9706eea5e1605255896f191ab00cb5706c5f1f2e1c293e9a718218dc"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v7/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "e37f7bd675322f3f81500b73559d60d5f602ca0537bf19f5cb06332c728c7b72"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_pure_v7b/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "b864bdc8695183433eef6e31cb8d33fad44ba3aded2170c1ade4ad5b2944ce23"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/opd_e4b_self_audit_v4/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "0026023745afb8f3dc1c176dc7f7171157b4ad5a66656b524af218e8e19ceee6"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/rft_e4b_aligned_v2/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "92a4515fee9d152b0d4c510ee3ce4caaaffe2003ba7584469f8027f174aab18c"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/rft_v1/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "a42453ccd7ac7680b0a03865e8e7080bc8bf74c8d9d193b440c441ed46f8512b"
    },
    {
      "path": "v2/experiments/train_data/rft_v2/verified_rft_messages.jsonl",
      "sha256": "18f4b3bd7e651f83c6acab479c9475e3fa50dc652a384f309e97146983ac85ba"
    }
  ]
}